| Friends Only |
[Apr. 10th, 2012|01:00 pm] |
The vast majority of my posts are friends-only. Feel free to comment or send me an e-mail if you would like to be added.
I don't really write in this journal much anymore, apart from knitting related items. I do still read my friends list fairly regularly and participate in communities, though. |
|
|
| Federal Rules of Civil Procedure |
[Sep. 18th, 2005|09:10 pm] |
Which Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Are You?
So incredibly geeky it's cool. I'm Rule 15. My husband is Rule 8(a). I forwarded the link to my Civ Pro professor, and he turned out to be 8(a) as well.
YOU ARE RULE 15!
You're a very helpful rule! You allow the attorney to amend their complaint once as a matter of course at any time before the answer is filed, and also allow amendments in other cases. If a claim relates back to the original transaction or occurrence outlined in the complaint, you can amend the complaint, even though the statute of limitations has run. Like a good friend, you're always there to help out in a bind.
( Possible Outcomes ) |
|
|
| Here it is... |
[Jan. 21st, 2005|06:41 pm] |
Today's moment of Zen:
Now, one can learn a great deal from television, but not how to think. Thinking requires dissecting an idea, like a laboratory frog, into its component parts, to determine how, or if, they fit together. Thinking requires the detection and tackling of hidden assumptions. Thinking requires that evidence be at hand, available for reference, not ephemeral, like a moving picture. Thinking takes time, and quiet, and patience, and assiduity. Most important, thinking requires articulateness.
One cannot refine a thought unless one has the words to express it precisely. An idea may be sensed, but it cannot be tested except in words. Unless one has explored a politician's reasoning, one will not know if his rhetoric is sincere or specious. Until one has laid the appeals of salesmen under the cool beam of reason, until one has extracted the claim from the jingle, one can't know what to believe. One cannot evaluate intellectual propositions emotionally; one cannot feel the correct answer. One must think in words. And, unless one thinks, one will never have an idea of one's own; one will be, perhaps unknowingly, a puppet on somebody's string.
Carll Tucker Saturday Review September 15, 1979 |
|
|
| I love my Orgo textbook |
[Sep. 4th, 2002|10:38 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| | contemplative | ] | How we respond to risk is significantly influenced by familiarity. The presence of chloroform in municipal water supplies - at a barely detectable level of 0.000 000 01% - has caused an outcry in many cities, yet chloroform has a lower acute toxicity than aspirin. Many foods contain natural ingredients that are far more toxic than synthetic food additives or pesticide residues, but the ingredients are ignored because the foods are familiar. Peanut butter, for example, may contain tiny amounts of aflatoxin, a far more potent cancer threat than sodium cyclamate, an artificial sweetener that has been banned in the United States because of its "risk."
- from Chemical Toxicity and Risk, an essay on pages 26-27 of Organic Chemistry, fifth edition, by John McMurry. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| |
|
|